Courtland v United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Local 408

Plaintiff: Sherry L Courtland
Defendant: United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Local 408, Southwest Regional Council of Carpenters, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Carpenters Joint Apprenticeship Training Committee, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Local 1506, Interior Systems, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Local 1914, Construction-Millwright and United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America
Case Number: 2:2007cv00331
Filed: February 13, 2007
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: Maricopa
Presiding Judge: Susan R Bolton
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Courtland v United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Local 408
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Local 408
Represented By: Desmond C Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Southwest Regional Council of Carpenters, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America
Represented By: Daniel Martin Shanley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carpenters Joint Apprenticeship Training Committee, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America
Represented By: Gordon Lewis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Local 1506, Interior Systems
Represented By: Daniel Martin Shanley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Local 1914, Construction-Millwright
Represented By: Daniel Martin Shanley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America
Represented By: Daniel Martin Shanley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sherry L Courtland
Represented By: Michael J Petitti
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?