Petramala v. Arizona Public Safety, Department of
| Mike Petramala |
| Arizona Department of Public Safety |
| 2:2007cv00427 |
| February 28, 2007 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| Roslyn O Silver |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2007. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 CLERK'S JUDGMENT in favor of Arizona Public Safety, Department of against Mike Petramala: that pursuant to the Court's order filed September 13, 2007, granting Defendant Arizona Department of Public Safety's Motion to Dismiss, judgment is entered in favor of defendant and against plaintiff. Plaintiff to take nothing, and complaint and action are dismissed without prejudice. (DNH, ) |
Filing 17
ORDER granting #6 Motion to Dismiss Case. This case shall be dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Roslyn O Silver on 09/12/07.(DNH)
|
|
Filing 16
ORDER - A Scheduling Conference is set for 9/14/2007 at 10:00 A.M. IT IS ORDERED this hearing is VACATED AND RESET to 10/5/2007 at 9:30 A.M. in Courtroom 604, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Judge Roslyn O Silver. Parties are reminded that Rule 16 documents, as set out in the original order, are due 10 days in advance of the hearing. Signed by Judge Roslyn O Silver on 09/10/2007. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (ROS, )
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER - A Scheduling Conference is set for 9/14/2007 at 9:30 A.M. IT IS ORDERED this hearing is VACATED and RESET to 9/14/2007 at 10:00 A.M. in Courtroom 604, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Judge Roslyn O Silver. THIS IS A TIME CHANGE ONLY!! Signed by Judge Roslyn O Silver on 08/21/2007. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (ROS, )
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER granting #13 Motion to Continue. IT IS ORDERED that the Scheduling Conference set for 08/16/07 is hereby continued until 9/14/2007 09:30 AM before Judge Roslyn O Silver. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Case Management Plan and the Proposed Rule 16 Scheduling Order are due 10 days in advance of the hearing. Signed by Judge Roslyn O Silver on 07/20/07.(DNH)
|
| Filing 13 MOTION to Continue hearing of 8/16/07 by Arizona Public Safety, Department of. (Maxi-Mullins, Lisa) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER - A Scheduling Conference is set for 8/10/2007 at 9:00 A.M. IT IS ORDERED this hearing is VACATED AND RESET to 8/16/2007 at 1:30 P.M. in Courtroom 604, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Judge Roslyn O Silver. The Case Management Plan and the Proposed Rule 16 Scheduling Order at due ten days in advance of the hearing. Signed by Judge Roslyn O Silver on 07/16/2007. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (ROS, )
|
| Filing 11 REPLY in Support re #8 MOTION for Return of Permit filed by Mike Petramala. (DNH) |
| Filing 10 RESPONSE to Motion re #8 MOTION for Return of Permit filed by Arizona Public Safety, Department of. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A#2 Exhibit Exhibit B)(Maxi-Mullins, Lisa) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: Scheduling Conference set for 8/10/2007 09:00 AM before Judge Roslyn O Silver. IT IS ORDERED that at the Case Management Meeting the counsel/parties shall prepare a Proposed Case Management Plan and a Proposed Scheduling Order and shall file them with the Court not less than 10 days before the Scheduling Conference. Signed by Judge Roslyn O Silver on 04/24/07. (DNH)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Return of Permit by Mike Petramala. (DNH) |
| Filing 7 RESPONSE to #6 MOTION to Dismiss Case (Telephonic Oral Argument Requested) filed by Mike Petramala. (DNH) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss Case by Arizona Public Safety, Department of. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit #2 Exhibit #3 Exhibit #4 Exhibit #5 Exhibit)(Maxi-Mullins, Lisa) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Arizona Public Safety, Department of. (HIH) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Roslyn O Silver on 03/07/07.(DNH)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Mike Petramala. (DNH) |
| Filing 2 This case has been assigned to the Honorable Roslyn O. Silver. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV07-427-PHX-ROS. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (HIH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT, filed by Mike Petramala.(HIH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Petramala v. Arizona Public Safety, Department of | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Mike Petramala | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Arizona Department of Public Safety | |
| Represented By: | Lisa Maxie-Mullins |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
