Strategic Diversity, Inc v. Alchemix Corp
Kenneth P. Weiss and Strategic Diveristy, Inc. |
Robert R. Horton, Cheryl Halota Horton, Alchemix Corporation and Medici Associates, LLC |
2:2007cv00929 |
May 7, 2007 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Phoenix Division Office |
Maricopa |
Earl H Carroll |
Other Statutes: Securities/Commodities |
15 U.S.C. ยง 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 284 ORDER: The Motion to Amended the Findings and Conclusions 281 is, in all respects, denied. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 11/15/2013.(ALS) |
Filing 279 AMENDED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff Weiss shall have thirty (30) days in which to tender his 250,000 shares of Alchemix stock to Medici and apprise this Court that he has done so. If within fourt een (14) days after the notice has been filed, Medici has not challenged the existence or adequacy of Weiss's tender, the Court shall enter judgment against Medici. Should this Court not receive notice of Weiss's tender within thirty (30 ) days of the date of this Order, then this suit will be dismissed with prejudice, with Weiss possessing his Alchemix stock, but no judgment against the Defendants. (See document for further details). Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 8/28/13. (LAD) |
Filing 277 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff Weiss shall have thirty (30) days in which to tender his 250,000 shares of Alchemix stock to Medici and apprise this Court that he has done so. If within fourteen (1 4) days after the notice has been filed, Medici has not challenged the existence or adequacy of Weiss's tender, the Court shall enter judgment against Medici. Should this Court not receive notice of Weiss's tender within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, then this suit will be dismissed with prejudice, with Weiss possessing his Alchemix stock, but no judgment against the Defendants. (See document for full details). Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 8/23/13. (LAD) |
Filing 248 ORDER denying 229 Defendants' Motion for Judgment and denying 230 Motion for New Trial. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 12/3/12.(DMT) |
Filing 148 ORDER Dfts' Motion 120 for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Plas' Motion 135 for Partial Summary Judgment is DENIED. Dfts' requests for judicial notice (Dkt. ## 126, 145) are DENIED. Directing the Clerk of the Court to TERMINATE this action. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 1/4/10.(KMG) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.