Rowe et al v. Bankers Life and Casualty Company et al
| Gloria A. Rowe and Fred Rowe |
| Bankers Life and Casualty Company and Falicia M. Soller |
| 2:2007cv01281 |
| June 29, 2007 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| Mary H Murguia |
| Insurance |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
153
ORDER signed by Judge Mary H Murguia on 12/9/08. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED granting in part and denying in part Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment. (Dkt.#89.)IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying Plaintiffs Motion to Reopen Discovery. (Dkt.#133.)IT IS FURT HER ORDERED denying Defendants Motion to Certify the Courts July 1, 2008 and September 18, 2008 Orders for Interlocutory Appeal. (Dkt.#146.)IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying as moot Plaintiffs Motion to Expedite Ruling and Trial (Dkt.#137.) and Defendants Motion to Strike Exhibit One to Plaintiffs Motion for Expedited Trial. (Dkt.#142.).IT IS FURTHER ORDERED setting this matter for a status hearing on December 22, 2008 at 4:30 p.m. to set a trial date.(KSP)
|
|
Filing
143
ORDER denying 138 Motion for Reconsideration but granting Defendants alternative Motion for Clarification to the extent set forth in this Order. FURTHER ORDERED directing Defendants to provide Plaintiffs with at least twenty-four months of coverage under their Policy. Signed by Judge Mary H Murguia on 9/15/08.(MAP)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
