Ramirez v. Bijins et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|May 12, 2009
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 11 of the Magistrate Judge; the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied and this action is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Stephen M McNamee on 5/12/09. (LSP)
|April 15, 2009
ORDER granting in part 14 Petitioner's Motion for Extension of Time. The deadline for Petitioner to file his objection to the Report and Recommendation is extended to Friday, May 15, 2009. Signed by Judge Stephen M McNamee on 4/15/09.(LSP)
|April 9, 2009
NOTICE OF ERRATA - Upon review of the 11 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, the Court noted that the incorrect case number was given at the end for filing objections. However, the correct case number appeared in the caption of the Report and Recommendation. In an effort to correct this mistake, the parties are hereby notified that the correct case number for filing objections to the Report and Recommendation is CV 07-1444-PHX-SMM. Signed by Judge Stephen M McNamee on 4/9/09. (SAT)
|March 27, 2009
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus : Recommending that the Petition be dismissed with prejudice. Parties have 10 days from date of service of this recommendation to to file specific written objections with the District Court. Case designation is: CV 07-1441-PHX-SMM. See attached PDF for additional infomation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline J Marshall on 3/27/09. (SSU, )
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?