Armstrong, et al v. Florence, Town of, et al
| Travis Armstrong and Blanca Armstrong |
| Florence, Town of, Cardest James and Jane Doe James |
| 2:2007cv01800 |
| September 20, 2007 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Pinal |
| Paul G Rosenblatt |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
41
ORDER pursuant to 40 Stipulation of Dismissal: ORDERED that the above entitled case is dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its own costs and attorney's fees. (See document for full details). Signed by Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 2/10/2009. (LAD)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER granting 36 Stipulation of Dismissal: All of pla Blanca Armstrong's claims are dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear their own attorney's fees and costs associated therewith. Signed by Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 1/12/2009. (LAD)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER granting 32 Stipulation of Dismissal of Count III. Count III (intentional infliction of emotional distress) of Plaintiffs' Complaint is dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear their own costs as to this Count. Signed by Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 1/4/09. (DMT, )
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED granting the 29 Stipulation to Extend Discovery Deadline. The parties shall complete their non-expert depositions no later than 12/1/08. Signed by Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 11/3/08. (SAT)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
