Juda v. Apker

Juda v. Apker

Petitioner:	Olaf Peter Juda
Respondent:	Craig Apker
Case Number:	2:2007cv01982
Filed:	October 12, 2007
Court:	US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office:	Phoenix Division Office
County:	Maricopa
Presiding Judge:	Hector C Estrada (PS)
Presiding Judge:	James A Teilborg
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 11, 2009	Filing 28 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 24 - Report and Recommendation is accepted to the extent indicated above, the 27 objections are overruled to the extent indicated above, the Petition is denied, with prejudice, and the Clerk of the court shall enter judgment accordingly. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that review of the record revealed there was a typographical error on the certificate of service of Respondent's Answer. (Doc. #16 at 9.) The Court does not find that a typographical error justifies striking an answer, thus to the extent Petitioner seeks this remedy, it is denied. However, the Clerk of the Court shall mail a copy of Respondent's Answer (Doc. #16) to Petitioner with a copy of this Order. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 5/8/09. (LSP)
February 27, 2009	Filing 24 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, recommening that the 3 Amended Petition for be denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Hector C Estrada on 2/27/09. (DMT, )

Date Filed

Document Text

May 11, 2009

Filing 28 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 24 - Report and Recommendation is accepted to the extent indicated above, the 27 objections are overruled to the extent indicated above, the Petition is denied, with prejudice, and the Clerk of the court shall enter judgment accordingly. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that review of the record revealed there was a typographical error on the certificate of service of Respondent's Answer. (Doc. #16 at 9.) The Court does not find that a typographical error justifies striking an answer, thus to the extent Petitioner seeks this remedy, it is denied. However, the Clerk of the Court shall mail a copy of Respondent's Answer (Doc. #16) to Petitioner with a copy of this Order. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 5/8/09. (LSP)

February 27, 2009

Filing 24 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, recommening that the 3 Amended Petition for be denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Hector C Estrada on 2/27/09. (DMT, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Juda v. Apker
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Olaf Peter Juda
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Craig Apker
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?