Taylor v. Pool Corporation et al
||Pool Corporation and Horizon Distributors, Inc
||October 15, 2007
||Arizona District Court
||Phoenix Division Office
||David G Campbell
|Nature of Suit:
||Civil Rights: Other
|Cause of Action:
||42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|February 17, 2010
ORDER denying Taylor's 142 Motion for waiver of the bond requirement for a stay pending appeal. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 2/16/10.(REW)
|January 22, 2010
ORDER denying 134 Horizon's Motion for bond for costs on appeal. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 1/22/10.(LSP)
|August 7, 2009
ORDER denying 123 Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 8/6/09.(DMT, )
|April 14, 2009
ORDER granting 99 Defendant's Motion to Strike re 95 Response in Opposition to Motion; denying 101 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages and granting 102 Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time, Defendant shall file a reply by 5/8/09. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 4/13/09.(LSP)
|November 7, 2008
ORDER that the discovery deadline shall be extended as follows: Discovery due by 12/19/2008. Additional extensions will not be granted. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 11/6/08. (KMG, )
|October 23, 2008
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that Dft shall produce Terry Speth for the completion of his deposition. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 10/23/08. (SAT)
|September 10, 2008
ORDER Plaintiff's Rule 56(f) motion 39 is granted and denying without prejudice 35 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 9/9/08.(LSP)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?