Dumisani v. State of Arizona, et al
Case Number: 2:2007cv02514
Filed: December 12, 2007
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Phoenix Division Office
Presiding Judge: Stephen M McNamee
Presiding Judge: Edward C Voss (PS)
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 23, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's 6/11/08 13 Motion for Remand to State Court is DENIED. Signed by Judge Stephen M McNamee on 10/22/08.(SAT)
February 5, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER granting 7 Motion for clarification to the extent that this Order informs plaintiff of the status of this case. Plaintiff has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a first amended complaint in compliance with the Courts January 14 , 2008 Order. If Plaintiff fails to timely comply, the Clerk of Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with prejudice that states that the dismissal counts as a strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The Clerk of Court must mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing a civil rights complaint by a prisoner.. Signed by Judge Stephen M McNamee on 2/4/08.(DMT, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dumisani v. State of Arizona, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?