Johnson v. Schriro et al
| Edward Charles Johnson |
| Unknown Zaborsky, Unknown Rice, Unknown Fansler, Unknown Stewart, Unknown Nepo, Unknown Baltierra, Dora B Schriro, Unknown Kimble, Unknown Werts, Unknown Rollins, Unknown Hook and Unknown Long |
| 2:2008cv00009 |
| January 2, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| Glenda E Edmonds (PS) |
| Mary H Murguia |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 9, 2008. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 JUDGMENT: IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff's Amended Complaint and this action are dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. This dismissal for failure to state a claim counts as a strike under 28 U.S.C. section 1915(g). (LAD) |
Filing 9
ORDER that the #8 Amended Complaint and this action are dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, and the Clerk must enter judgment accordingly. The Clerk must make an entry on the docket stating that the dismissal for failure to state a claim counts as a "strike" under 28 USC section 1915(g). Signed by Judge Mary H Murguia on 10/7/2008. (LAD)
|
| Filing 8 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Hook, Stewart, Baltierra, Dora B Schriro, Rollins, Kimble, Zaborsky, Long, Fansler ; Party Werts; Nepo and Rice terminated, filed by Edward Charles Johnson.(KMG, ) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER Directing Monthly Payments be made from Prison Account of Edward Charles Johnson. Signed by Judge Mary H Murguia on 7/10/08. (MAP)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER (1) granting #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; (2) denying as moot #5 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (3) Plaintiff must pay the $350 filing fee and is assessed an initial partial filing fee of $4.86 (4) Plaintiffs request in the Complaint for the appointment of counsel is denied (5) The Complaint #1 is dismissed for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a first amended complaint in compliance with this Order (6) If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with prejudice that states that the dismissal counts as a "strike" under 28 USG 1915(g) (7) The Clerk of Court must mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing a civil rights complaint by a prisoner. Signed by Judge Mary H Murguia on 7/10/08.(MAP)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Edward Charles Johnson. (DMT, ) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Edward Charles Johnson. (DMT, ) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER Within 30 days of the date this Order is filed, Plaintiff must either pay the $350.00 filing fee or file a completed Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and a certified six-month trust account statement from the ADOC's Central Office. If Plaintiff fails to timely comply, the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice to Plaintiff. The Clerk of the Court must mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Non-Habeas). Special Prisoner Deadline due by 2/14/2008.. Signed by Judge Mary H Murguia on 1/11/08. (DMT, )
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT: (REK) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT, filed by Edward Charles Johnson.(REK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
