Johnson v. Schriro et al
Edward Charles Johnson |
Unknown Zaborsky, Unknown Rice, Unknown Fansler, Unknown Stewart, Unknown Nepo, Unknown Baltierra, Dora B Schriro, Unknown Kimble, Unknown Werts, Unknown Rollins, Unknown Hook and Unknown Long |
2:2008cv00009 |
January 2, 2008 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Phoenix Division Office |
Maricopa |
Glenda E Edmonds (PS) |
Mary H Murguia |
Prisoner: Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 9, 2008. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 JUDGMENT: IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff's Amended Complaint and this action are dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. This dismissal for failure to state a claim counts as a strike under 28 U.S.C. section 1915(g). (LAD) |
![]() |
Filing 8 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Hook, Stewart, Baltierra, Dora B Schriro, Rollins, Kimble, Zaborsky, Long, Fansler ; Party Werts; Nepo and Rice terminated, filed by Edward Charles Johnson.(KMG, ) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Edward Charles Johnson. (DMT, ) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Edward Charles Johnson. (DMT, ) |
![]() |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT: (REK) |
Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT, filed by Edward Charles Johnson.(REK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.