Monroe et al v. Gagan et al
| James A. Monroe and Kimberly Monore Pirtle |
| James L Gagan and Ross Miljenovich |
| Ross Miljenovich |
| 2:2008cv00018 |
| January 4, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| Earl H Carroll |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
ORDER granting Plas' 19 Motion to Amend Complaint. The Clerk is directed to file Plas Second Amended Complaint (doc.#22) previously lodged with the court. Signed by Judge Robert C Broomfield on 3/2/09.(KMG)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER that pla's 7 Motion to Remand is denied without prejudice; dft Ross Miljenovich's 10 Motion to Remand is denied on the condition that dft James L. Gagan files an amended Notice of Removal within 15 days of the date hereof; if dft Gagan does not timely file such notice, the court will GRANT dft Ross Miljenovich's motion to remand for lack of subject matter jurisdiction; and dft James L. Gagan has 15 days from the date of entry of this order in which to file an amended Notice of Removal. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the remand of Monroe v. Gagan without further notice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Robert C Broomfield on 09/29/08. (ESL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
