Aerisa, Inc. v. Plasma-Air International et al
Aerisa, Inc. |
Plasma-Air International, Terry A. Busskohl, Clifford Miller, Lawrence Sunshine and John Collins |
2:2008cv00227 |
February 4, 2008 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Phoenix Division Office |
Maricopa |
Neil V Wake |
Plaintiff |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1051 Trademark Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 39 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION: Defendant Plasma-Air International, Terry A. Busskohl, and Clifford Miller, their officers, directors, agents, servants, attorneys, employees, privies, successors, licensees and assigns , and all persons holding for or through them, or acting in concert with them, are hereby preliminarily enjoined from: (a) Removing Aerisa's name (or the name of any of Aerisa's predecessors in interest) from test reports for Aerisa's products and inserting the name Plasma-Air thereby falsely representing that the test reports are for Plasma-Air's products; (b) Using testimonials on Plasma-Air's website (or elsewhere) that are actually for Aerisa's products and fals ely representing that they are for Plasma-Air's products; and (c) Stating or implying on Plasma- Air's website (or anywhere else) that Plasma-Air is the worldwide successor to the Bentax Technology. FURTHER ORDERED that no bond is required for this Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Judge Neil V Wake on 12/11/08. (DNH) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.