Door Doctor West, Inc. v. Overhead Door Doctor, Inc.

Plaintiff: Door Doctor West, Inc.
Defendant: Overhead Door Doctor, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2008cv00292
Filed: February 14, 2008
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: Maricopa
Presiding Judge: Michelle H Burns
Nature of Suit: Both
Cause of Action: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 24, 2008 31 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that Dft's 19 Motion to Amend Answer is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall file Dft's Lodged Proposed Amended Answer (Doc. # 21). Signed by Magistrate Judge Michelle H Burns on 10/23/08.(SAT)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Door Doctor West, Inc. v. Overhead Door Doctor, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Door Doctor West, Inc.
Represented By: Ivan Joseph Mlachak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Overhead Door Doctor, Inc.
Represented By: Cynthia Dawn Beck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?