Lopez v. Schriro et al
| Santiago O Lopez |
| Dora Schriro and Arizona Attorney General, State of |
| 2:2008cv00435 |
| March 5, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Habeas Corpus (General) Office |
| Maricopa |
| Jay R Irwin (PS) |
| John W Sedwick |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 17 Report and Recommendations. The petition is denied as to the portion of Ground 1 which asserts ineffective assistance of counsel with respect to mitigating and aggravating circumstances, and all of Ground 2; and the remainder of the petition is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge John W Sedwick on 07/24/09. (ESL)
|
|
Filing
17
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus : Recommending that that the portion of Ground 1 asserting ineffective assistance with regard to mitigating and aggravating circumstances, and all of Ground 2 of the Petitioner' s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed March 5, 2008 (#1) be DENIED. FURTHER RECOMMENDED that the remainder of Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed March 5, 2008 (#1) be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jay R Irwin on 06/18/09. (KMG, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
