Vivirito v. Arizona, State of
Plaintiff: Edward M. Vivirito
Defendant: Arizona, State of
Case Number: 2:2008cv00891
Filed: May 8, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County: Maricopa
Presiding Judge: David G Campbell
Presiding Judge:
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:451 Employment Discrimination

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 4, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER denying as moot 6 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss; granting 25 Stipulated Motion to Amend the Complaint. The Clerk is directed to file the proposed amended complaint 26 . Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 11/4/08.(TLJ)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Vivirito v. Arizona, State of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Edward M. Vivirito
Represented By: Michelle Ray Matheson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Arizona, State of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?