Nakano v. United States of America

Plaintiff: Raymond T. Nakano
Defendant: United States of America
Case Number: 2:2008cv01026
Filed: June 2, 2008
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Taxes Office
County: Maricopa
Presiding Judge: Roslyn O Silver
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 26:7422 IRS: Refund Excise Tax

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 21, 2009 23 Opinion or Order of the Court VACATED IN PART PER 33 ORDER OF 11/12/09 - granting Plaintiff's 20 Motion to Enjoin Proceedings; denying Defendant's 17 Motion to Stay. Signed by Judge Roslyn O Silver on 7/21/09.(REW, ) Modified on 11/12/2009 (DMT, ).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nakano v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Raymond T. Nakano
Represented By: Terence Dale Woolston
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?