Frank Lloyd Wright Foundation v. Kroeter et al
| Frank Lloyd Wright Foundation |
| Stephen Kroeter, Archetype Associates, Inc., Archetype Associates and Steven Fields Design Associates |
| 2:2008cv01112 |
| June 13, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Contract: Other Office |
| Maricopa |
| David G Campbell |
| Plaintiff |
| Diversity |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
189
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 142 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 142 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying 168 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part [170 ] Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 175 Motion to Strike ; finding as moot 186 Motion to Strike. A status conference is set before the Honorable David G. Campbell on 4/2/2010 at 3:30 p.m. in Courtroom 603, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, Arizona 85003. The purpose of the status conference will be to address the trial in this matter and whether the Court should rule on the excess benefits transaction issue separately from the trial on other issues. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 3/15/2010.(NVO)
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 25 Motion to Dismiss Party. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 12/3/2008.(NVJ)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
