Trussnet USA, Inc. v. Lendrum, et al
Trussnet USA, Inc. |
George D Slessman, Shannon P Slessman, William D Slessman, Sarah I Slessman, Peter A Lendrum, Jamie R Lendrum and Richard Thomas |
2:2008cv01181 |
June 26, 2008 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Racketeer/Corrupt Organization Office |
Maricopa |
G Murray Snow |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
18:1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 48 AMENDED ORDER re 47 ORDER: that the Lendrums' motion to stay the courtproceedings and compel arbitration 19 is GRANTED in respect to the claims asserted against Defendant Peter Lendrum. FURTHER ORDERED that the court proceedings are stayed in respect to the claims asserted against Defendants George and Shannon Slessman and William and Sarah Slessman pending the completion of the arbitration between Plaintiff and Defendant Peter Lendrum.Tthat Plaintiff and Defendant Peter Lendrum shall file quarterly reports with the Court informing the Court of the status of the arbitration proceedings. The first report will be due by 03/01/09. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 12/10/08. (DNH) |
Filing 47 ORDER granting 19 Motion to stay the court proceedings and compel arbitration is GRANTED in respect to the claims asserted against Defendant Peter Lendrum. FURTHER ORDERED that the court proceedings are stayed in respect to the claims asserted agai nst Defendants George and Shannon Slessman and William and Sarah Slessman pending the completion of the arbitration between Pla and Defendant Peter Lendrum. FURTHER ORDERED that the motions to dismiss of both the Lendrums and Slessmans 19 , 23 are DENIED AS MOOT WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FURTHER ORDERED that Pla and Defendant Peter Lendrum shall file quarterly reports with the Court informing the Court of the status of the arbitration proceedings. The first report will be due by 03/01/09. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 12/08/08.(DNH) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.