Surgick v. Martinez et al
| Zachariah A Surgick |
| Martinez and Arizona Attorney General, State of |
| 2:2008cv01427 |
| August 4, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Habeas Corpus (General) Office |
| Pima |
| Mary H Murguia |
| Edward C Voss (PS) |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
46
AMENDED ORDER re 44 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 35 . FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's certificate of appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal are DENIED. (See document for full details). Signed by Judge Mary H Murguia on 3/1/10. (LAD)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 35 as corrected by the Notice of Error/Order 43 . ORDER that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 1 be denied and dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Mary H Murguia on 2/15/10. (TLJ)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER, Counts Five and Seven of the Petition are dismissed without prejudice; the Clerk must serve a copy of the 1 Petition and this Order on the Respondent and the Attorney General of the State of Arizona; this matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Edward C Voss for further proceedings and a report and recommendation. Signed by Judge Mary H Murguia on 9/12/08. (REW, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
