Mangano v. Yuma Probation Department

Plaintiff: Peter Anthony Mangano
Defendant: Yuma Probation Department
Case Number: 2:2008cv01486
Filed: August 12, 2008
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Civil Rights: Other Office
County: Yuma
Presiding Judge: Michelle H Burns
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 9, 2009 21 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 7 Motion to Dismiss Case; denying as moot 18 Motion to allow electronic filing ; denying as moot 20 Emergency Motion to Stay Case Proceedings. That this case is Dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michelle H Burns on 7/8/09.(DMT, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mangano v. Yuma Probation Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Peter Anthony Mangano
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Yuma Probation Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?