Enea Embedded Technology, Inc et al v. Eneas Corporation et al
| Enea Embedded Technology, Inc and Enea AB |
| Eneas Corporation, Enea Embedded Technology, Inc., Enea AB, Inc., Enea, Inc., Maurice Amidei and Anthony Amidei |
| 2:2008cv01595 |
| August 27, 2008 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Trademark Office |
| Maricopa |
| G Murray Snow |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 15:1051 Trademark Infringement |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
ORDER granting 13 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss without prejudice to Plaintiffs refiling should Defendants engage in a "commercial use" of the ENEA trademark. ORDER that Plaintiffs' Motion to Dismiss Defendants' counterclaims 29 is granted. ORDER that the Clerk of Court is directed to terminate this action. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 3/10/09.(TLJ)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER that Plas shall file their written election to either consent to magistrate- judge jurisdiction or elect to proceed before a United States district judge on or before Monday, September 15, 2008. FURTHER ORDERED that Dfts shall file their writte n election to either consent to magistrate-judge jurisdiction or elect to have this case assigned to a United States district judge within 20 days of its appearance herein or as otherwise directed by the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence O Anderson on 9/2/08. (KMG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
