Campbell-Thomson v. Cox Com, Inc

Plaintiff: Sheila C Campbell-Thomson
Defendant: Cox Com, Inc
Case Number: 2:2008cv01656
Filed: September 9, 2008
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Labor: Fair Standards Office
County: Maricopa
Presiding Judge: G Murray Snow
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 15:5(a) Fair Labor Standards Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 5, 2010 68 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting in part and denying in part 40 Cox's Motion for Summary Judgment, see PDF document for details; denying 42 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment on her FLSA claims. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying as moot 67 parties Stipulation to temporarily hold the Court's decision on the pending motions and to modify the Court's scheduling order. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 5/4/10.(LSP)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Campbell-Thomson v. Cox Com, Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sheila C Campbell-Thomson
Represented By: Carl R Retter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cox Com, Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?