Best Western International, Inc. v. Niagara River Hotels, Inc. et al
Best Western International, Inc. |
Niagara River Hotels, Inc. and Mangat Verma |
2:2008cv01740 |
September 23, 2008 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Trademark Office |
Maricopa |
David G Campbell |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
15:1051 Trademark Infringement |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 27 ORDER AND DEFAULT JUDGMENT granting 26 Plaintiff Best Western International, Inc.s motion for default judgment. Default Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff Best Western International, Inc. against Defendants Niagara River Hotels, Inc. and Man gat Verma on Counts I and II of the complaint in the amount of $24,251.24 plus interest at the rate of 1.5% per month from 4/1/09 until paid in full. Default judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendants on Counts III of the complaint in the amount of $330,480.00. Default judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendants on Counts IV through X of the complaint with respect to an award of reasonable attorney fees and costs. Plaintiff is awarded attorneys' fees and costs in the amount of $5,699.05. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 6/16/09. (LSP) |
Filing 25 ORDER denying 23 Motion for Default Judgment. Plaintiff shall have until 5/29/2009 to file a new motion for default judgment consistent with this order. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 5/14/2009.(NVO) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.