Eljammal v. Humetewa et al
| Moustapha Lotfi Eljammal |
| Diane J. Humetewa and Michael B. Mukasey |
| 2:2008cv01778 |
| September 29, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Prisoner: Vacate Sentence Office |
| Maricopa |
| David G Campbell |
| Edward C Voss (PS) |
| None |
| U.S. Government Defendant |
| 28:2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
48
ORDER Petitioner's re 1 Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255) is denied. The Clerk of Court shall terminate this action. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 8/27/10. (KMG)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER granting 25 Government's Motion to Continue. Evidentiary Hearing re-set for 4/20/2010 01:00 PM in Courtroom 603, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Judge David G Campbell. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 2/9/10.(LSP)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER Accepting in part and Denying in part REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 21 . Evidentiary Hearing set for 2/23/2010 09:00 AM before Judge David G Campbell. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 1/27/10. (see order for details)(DMT)
|
|
Filing
21
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, Recommending that the 1 Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255) be denied; that Movant's request for an evidentiary hearing be denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edward C Voss on 11/23/09. (REW, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
