Marlyn Nutraceuticals, Inc v. Improvita Health Products, Inc. et al
| Marlyn Nutraceuticals, Inc |
| Improvita Health Products, Inc., Thomas Klamet and Daniel Kohler |
| 2:2008cv01798 |
| October 1, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Contract: Other Office |
| Maricopa |
| Mary H Murguia |
| Defendant |
| Federal Question |
| 28:1446pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
30
ORDER that Dfts Thomas Klamet and Daniel Kohler's 26 Motion for Judgement on the Pleadings, is denied. That Dfts request to Dismiss Pla's claims for lack of personal jurisdiction, (Dkt. # 26 ), is denied as to Pla's fraud claim and g ranted as to Pla's negligent misrepresentation claim. It is further ordered that Pla' claim for negligent misrepresentation will remain part of this case under the Court's discretionary application of pendent personal jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Mary H Murguia on 09/29/09. (ESL)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER granting Dfts' 7 Motion to Dismiss. The Case is dismissed without prejudice; that Pla's 12 Motion for Expedited Hearing is denied as moot; that the parties must submit to arbitration no later than 12/23/08. If arbitration does not occur within the specified time, the Court will permit Pla to file a motion to re-open the case; directing the Clerk of the Court to enter Judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Mary H Murguia on 11/24/08. (ESL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
