Coleman v. Phoenix Art Museum
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|April 22, 2009
ORDER - Pla Wayne Coleman's 17 Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint is granted. FURTHER ORDERED that Dft Phoenix Art Museum's 13 Motion toDismiss is granted; Dft's 14 Motion for Summary Disposition is denied; Dft's 21 Moti on to Strike Pla's Leave to Amend is denied; Dft's 22 Motion to Strike Pla's Motion to Dismiss Rule 26(f), Rule 26(a), and Notice of Initial Disclosure and Motion to Dismiss Standard Civil Track Initial Order is denied as moot. FURTH ER ORDERED that Pla's 18 Motion for Jury Trial is denied as moot; Pla's 19 Motion to Dismiss Rule 26(f), Rule 26(a), and Notice of Initial Disclosure is denied as moot; Pla's 20 Motion to Dismiss: StandardCivil Track Initial Orde r is denied as moot; Pla's 24 Motion to DenyDefense Motion to Strike Pla's Leave to Amend is denied as moot; Pla's 25 Motion to Deny: Request for Summary Disposition of Dft's Motion to Dismiss is denied as moot; Pla's [28 ] Motion to Deny/Motion to StrikeStandard Civil Track Initial Order is denied as moot; Pla's 29 Motion toFile Responsive Pleading is denied as moot; Pla's 32 Motion to Set aPretrial Conference is denied as moot; and that Pla's 35 Motion for Leave toFile Notice of Initial Disclosure is denied as moot. FURTHER ORDERED vacating oral argument currently set for Monday, 6/15/09, at 11:00 a.m. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall close this case. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 4/21/09. (SAT)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?