Henderson v. Schriro et al
|Shawn Lorin Henderson
|Dora B. Schriro and Arizona Attorney General, State of
|October 6, 2008
|US District Court for the District of Arizona
|Habeas Corpus (General) Office
|Jay R Irwin (PS)
|G Murray Snow
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
|28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|March 2, 2010
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 12 . Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 1 is DENIED. The Clerk of Court shall TERMINATE this action. A certificate of appealability is DENIED with respect to Petitioner's habeas claims. Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 3/2/10. (DMT)
|February 9, 2010
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending that Charles L. Ryan, as successor to Dora Schriro as Director of the Arizona Department of Corrections, be SUBSTITUTED for Respondent Dora Schriro. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED recommending that the portion of 1 Pet itioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed on October 6, 2008, alleging ineffective assistance of counsel based on failure to advise Petitioner on consecutive sentencing be DENIED. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that the remainder of Petitio ner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed on October 6, 2008 (#1), be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that in the event this Report & Recommendation is adopted, that a certificate of appealability BE DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jay R Irwin on 2/8/10. (LSP)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?