Clark v. Schriro et al
| Kraig Clark |
| Dora B Schriro and Arizona Attorney General, State of |
| 2:2008cv01844 |
| October 9, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Habeas Corpus (General) Office |
| Pinal |
| Lawrence O Anderson (PS) |
| G Murray Snow |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 11 . Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied and the Clerk of Court shall terminate this action. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 7/7/09. (DMT, )
|
|
Filing
11
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus : Recommending that the Petition be denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence O Anderson on 6/11/09. (DMT, )
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: that Petitioner's 3 Motion/Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is granted. The Clerk of Court must serve a copy of the 1 Petition and this Order on the Respondent and the Attorney General of the State of Arizona. Respondents must answer the Petition within 40 days of the date of service. Petitioner may file a reply within 30 days from the date of service of the answer. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Lawrence O. Anderson for further proceedings and a report and recommendation. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 10/23/08. (SAT)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
