E.M.C. International, Inc. v. 25th Street Industrial, LLC, et al
Plaintiff: E.M.C. International, Inc.
Defendant: 25th Street Industrial, LLC
Case Number: 2:2008cv01861
Filed: October 9, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Contract: Other Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Mary H Murguia
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 29, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED granting Dft's 13 Motion to Dismiss without prejudice. FURTHER ORDERED directing the clerk to enter jgm accordingly. Signed by Judge Mary H Murguia on 9/28/09.(SAT)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: E.M.C. International, Inc. v. 25th Street Industrial, LLC, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: E.M.C. International, Inc.
Represented By: Richard G Neuheisel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 25th Street Industrial, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?