Geonkova v. Sunrise Scottsdale Senior Living LLC, et al
| Daniela Geonkova |
| Sunrise Scottsdale Senior Living LLC and Fictitious Entities 1-10 |
| 2:2008cv01907 |
| October 17, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Civil Rights: Jobs Office |
| Maricopa |
| Roslyn O Silver |
| Plaintiff |
| Diversity |
| 28:1331 Fed. Question |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
55
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED Dft's 40 Motion for Summary Jgm IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Dft is granted summary jgm on all Pla's claims except for the fraud claim. FURTHER ORDERED Dft Sunrise Scottsdale Senior Living, LLC, is replaced as Dft by Sunrise Senior Living Management, Inc. Pla shall file an Amended Complaint with a caption that reflects this substitution. The Answer and Summary Jgm briefing on file shall remain Dft Sunrise Senior Living Management, Inc.'s operative answer and dispositive motion. FURTHER ORDERED the parties shall file the pretrial documents referenced in the Court's Scheduling Order within 30 days of the date of this Order. FURTHER ORDERED by 14 days from the date of this Order, the parties shall jointly file a notice of efforts at settlement, including whether the assistance of the Court is required. FURTHER ORDERED a Final Pretrial Conference will be set by separate order. Signed by Judge Roslyn O Silver on 9/20/10. (SAT)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
