Mason v. Schriro et al
Jerome Mason |
Dora B. Schriro and Arizona Attorney General, State of |
2:2008cv01970 |
October 27, 2008 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Habeas Corpus (General) Office |
Navajo |
Jay R Irwin (PS) |
Paul G Rosenblatt |
None |
Federal Question |
28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 13 of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the portion of Ground One based on trial counsel's failure to submit an affidavit by Petitioner's passenger and all of Ground Three (actual in nocence) of the Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED. The remainder of Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk shall close this case. Signed by Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 2/8/10. (LSP) |
Filing 13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus : Recommending that the Portion of Ground One based on trial counsel's failure to submit an affidavit by Petitioner's passenger and all of Ground Three ( actual innocence) of the Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be denied. Further recommended that the remainder of Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jay R Irwin on 10/27/09. (ESL, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.