Gerhold v. LifeLock, Inc. et al

Plaintiff:	Kevin Gerhold
Defendant:	LifeLock, Inc., Richard Todd Davis and John Does 1 through 10, Inclusive
Case Number:	2:2008cv02031
Filed:	November 13, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office:	Fraud or Truth-In-Lending Office
County:	XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge:	Mary H Murguia
Nature of Suit:	Plaintiff
Cause of Action:	Diversity
Jury Demanded By:	28:1332 Diversity-Fraud

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 24, 2009	Filing 31 ORDER granting 74 (in lead MDL-08-1977) Consolidated Motion to Remand to State Court. ORDERED directing the Clerk to remand Gerhold v. Lifelock, Inc.,et al., 2:08-0857 (S.D.W.V.) back to the Circuit Court of Jackson County, West Virginia. FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk to remand Falke v. Lifelock, Inc., et al., 08-CV-1351 (D. Md.) back to the Circuit Court for Washington County, Maryland. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Master Complaint not include claims from individuals located in eith er the State of West Virginia or the State of Maryland. FURTHER ORDERED granting 91 (in lead MDL 08-1977) Justin M. Kleins Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Signed by Judge Mary H Murguia on 7/24/09. (Original Order filed in MDL 08-1977, doc #100) (MAP)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 24, 2009

Filing 31 ORDER granting 74 (in lead MDL-08-1977) Consolidated Motion to Remand to State Court. ORDERED directing the Clerk to remand Gerhold v. Lifelock, Inc.,et al., 2:08-0857 (S.D.W.V.) back to the Circuit Court of Jackson County, West Virginia. FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk to remand Falke v. Lifelock, Inc., et al., 08-CV-1351 (D. Md.) back to the Circuit Court for Washington County, Maryland. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Master Complaint not include claims from individuals located in eith er the State of West Virginia or the State of Maryland. FURTHER ORDERED granting 91 (in lead MDL 08-1977) Justin M. Kleins Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Signed by Judge Mary H Murguia on 7/24/09. (Original Order filed in MDL 08-1977, doc #100) (MAP)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gerhold v. LifeLock, Inc. et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kevin Gerhold
Represented By:	Kristina Thomas Whiteaker
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: LifeLock, Inc.
Represented By:	Michael B. Victorson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Richard Todd Davis
Represented By:	Michael B. Victorson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: John Does 1 through 10, Inclusive
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?