Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Mortgage Firm, Inc.

Plaintiff: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Defendant: Mortgage Firm, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2008cv02045
Filed: November 5, 2008
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Contract: Other Office
County: Maricopa
Presiding Judge: G Murray Snow
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Jury Demanded By: 12:1821 Default of Loan by Promissary Note

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
January 22, 2010 24 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that Pla's 21 Motion for Extension of Discovery Deadline, is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence O Anderson on 1/21/10.(SAT)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Mortgage Firm, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Represented By: Alan Lee Tipton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mortgage Firm, Inc.
Represented By: Kenneth E Chase
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?