Armorworks Enterprises, LLC v. BAE Systems AH, Inc. et al
Armorworks Enterprises, LLC |
BAE Systems Aerospace & Defense Group Inc., BAE Systems Mobility & Protection Systems Inc. and BAE Systems AH, Inc. |
2:2008cv02060 |
November 6, 2008 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Anti-Trust Office |
Maricopa |
Frederick J Martone |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
15:1 Antitrust Litigation |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 26 CONSOLIDATION ORDER - MEMBER CASE granting BAE's 7 Motion to Transfer and Consolidate CV08-1697-PHX-JAT with CV 08-2060-PHX-FJM. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall transfer CV 08-2060-PHX-FJM to this Court and consolidate it with CV08-1697-PHX-JAT. All future filings shall bear case number CV08-1697-PHX-JAT as the lead case. All future filings related to these cases shall be filed in CV08-1697-PHX-JAT. A copy of this order shall be provided to District Judge Frederick J. Martone. Vacating oral argument currently set for 04/20/09. Denying ArmorWorks' Motion to Dismiss filed in LEAD case. ArmorWorks shall answer within 20 days of this Order. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 04/13/09. (ESL) |
Filing 24 ORDER denying 8 Motion to Dismiss Case FURTHER ORDERED granting 9 Motion to stay the deadline for responsive pleadings and ordering defendants to file a responsive pleading within 10 days of this order. Signed by Judge Frederick J Martone on 3/27/09.(MAP) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.