Barrett v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|January 4, 2010
ORDER Dfts Maricopa County, the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors and the Director of Correctional Health Services' Motion to Dismiss Doc. # 17 is granted in part and denied in part as follows: (a) The Maricopa County Board of Supervisors is dismissed; (b) The First and Second Causes of Action are dismissed with prejudice; (c) The Fifth Cause of Action is dismissed; (d) Unexhausted claims, as discussed in section IV(A) of this Order, are dismissed;(e) Claims for punitive damages against Maricopa County are dismissed with prejudice; and (f) Claims for denial of equal protection, denial of privileges and immunities, and violations of the Fourth Amendment, Eighth Amendment, and 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3) are dismissed. Dft Joseph Arpaio and Ava Arpaio's Motion to dismiss Doc. # 18 is granted, and they are dismissed from the action. John Does I-X; Jane Does I-X; Black Corporations I-V; White Partnerships IV; and XYZ Entities 1-10 are dismissed. The remaining claims are against the Director of CHS and Maricopa County for denial of medical care, in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment, for the period from approximately July 17 to approximately July 21, 2008. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Burns pursuant to Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for all pretrial proceedings as authorized under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 1/4/10.(KMG, )
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?