Graham v. Geico General Insurance Company et al

Defendant: Geico General Insurance Company
Case Number: 2:2008cv02107
Filed: November 14, 2008
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Motor Vehicle Office
County: Maricopa
Presiding Judge: Mary H Murguia
Nature of Suit: Defendant
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
November 24, 2008 9 Opinion or Order of the Court NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT AND ORDER. This matter has been assigned to Magistrate Judge Lawrence O Anderson; Defendants Geico General Insurance Company and American Family Mutual Insurance Company shall each have until 12/10/08 within which to file their written elections to either consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction or elect to proceed before a United States district judge; Plaintiff Rebecca Graham shall either consent to proceed before a magistrate judge or elect to proceed before a district judge by 12/10/08. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence O Anderson on 11/21/08. (REW, ) Modified on 11/25/2008 to correct spacing. (DNH).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Graham v. Geico General Insurance Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Geico General Insurance Company
Represented By: Sanford Keith Gerber
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?