Talley v. Pembrooke Occupational Health, Inc. et al
| Julia Ann Talley |
| Pembrooke Occupational Health, Inc. and Does 1 through 10 |
| 2:2008cv02165 |
| November 24, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Contract: Other Office |
| Maricopa |
| Frederick J Martone |
| None |
| Diversity |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
56
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED DENYING Pembrooke's 41 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. FURTHER ORDERED GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART Talley's 43 Motion for Summary Judgment. The motion is granted as to liability on Talley's breach of contract claim regarding the DOI account. The motion is otherwise denied. Signed by Judge Frederick J Martone on 4/21/10. (SAT)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER denying Defendant's 7 Motion to Dismiss or alternatively to Transfer Venue. Signed by Judge Frederick J Martone on 3/27/09.(REW, )
|
|
Filing
6
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT AND ORDER. Defendant Pembrooke Occupational Health, Inc., shall file on or before 12/15/08 its written election to either consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction or elect to proceed before a US district judge; Plaintiff shall either consent to proceed before a magistrate judge or elect to proceed before a district judge by 12/15/08. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence O Anderson on 11/26/08. (REW, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
