Wathen v. Arizona Corrections, Department of et al
| Vera Wathen |
| Arizona Corrections, Department of, Dora B. Schriro and Jerry Sternes |
| 2:2008cv02212 |
| December 3, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| Yuma |
| Frederick J Martone |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
67
ORDER GRANTING Demetri Soto, Edith Martinez, and John Scala's motion 45 to dismiss with prejudice. This, of course, is without prejudice to the right of plaintiff to bring an action in state court for wrongful death. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED DENY ING defendants' motion 65 for extension of time to file a dispositive motion on grounds of mootness. Together with our Order of August 25, 2009 doc. 34 , all the claims against all the parties have been resolved. The clerk shall enter final judgment. Signed by Judge Frederick J Martone on 5/13/10.(KMG)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER granting 22 Schriro and Sternes's Motion to Dismiss Case. Plaintiff's claims against the non-moving defendants, John Scala, Demetrio Soto, and Edith Martinez, remain. Signed by Judge Frederick J Martone on 8/25/09.(LSP)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER denying as moot 11 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss; granting 17 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend. The clerk shall file the lodged amended complaint under LRCiv. 15.1(c). Signed by Judge Frederick J Martone on 6/5/09.(TLJ)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
