Sharp v. Maricopa County et al
| Bobby Ray Sharp |
| Maricopa County, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Joseph Arpaio and Correctional Health Services |
| 2:2008cv02316 |
| December 19, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Prisoner - Prison Condition Office |
| Maricopa |
| David G Campbell |
| Jay R Irwin (PS) |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
ORDER granting 38 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and the claims are dismissed without prejudice. The action is terminated, and the Clerk of Court must enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 4/7/10.(LSP)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER that the reference to the Magistrate Judge is withdrawn as to Arpaio's Motion to dismiss (Doc. #26). Arpaio's Motion to dismiss 26 is granted, and he is dismissed without prejudice from the action. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 2/4/10.(DMT)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: Pla's 29 OBJECTION to Judge Irwin's 28 Report and Recommendation is denied. The findings of the magistrate judge are affirmed. Dfts' 27 Motion to Set Aside entry of default is granted. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 12/14/09. (SAT) DOCKET TEXT MODIFIED TO CORRECT JUDGE'S SIGNATURE DATE FROM (12/15/09) TO (12/14/09) ON 12/16/2009 (MHU).
|
|
Filing
28
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, Recommending that the 27 MOTION to Set Aside the Entry of Default be granted; further recommending that the default entered against Defendants Arpaio and Maricopa County on 10/2/09 24 be set side and that Defendants' Answer 25 and Motion to Dismiss 26 be deemed timely filed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jay R Irwin on 11/6/09. (REW, )
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: Dfts Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Maricopa County Correctional Health Services, John Does I-X, and Black Corporations I-V are dismissed without prejudice. (Doc.# 12.) Dfts Maricopa County and Sheriff Arpaio must answe r Pla's claims for deliberate indifference to Pla's serious medical needs contained in the First Amended Complaint. (Doc.# 12.) Pla must serve Dfts Maricopa County and Sheriff Arpaio with the First Amended Complaint. Each Dft must answer th e First Amended Complaint or otherwise respond by appropriate motion within 30 days from the date the First Amended Complaint is served on it or him. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Jay R. Irwin for all pretrial proceedings as authorized under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 3/12/09. (SAT)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER that 1 COMPLAINT is dismissed with 30 days leave to amend. Clerk must enter dismissal with prejudice if Plaintiff fails to comply. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 1/21/09. (LSP)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
