Scheitlin v. Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.

Plaintiff: Douglas G Scheitlin
Defendant: Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2008cv02342
Filed: December 24, 2008
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Labor: Other Office
County: Maricopa
Presiding Judge: Edward C Voss
Referring Judge:
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 29:621 Job Discrimination (Age)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 3, 2010 106 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 52 Defendant's MOTION for Summary Judgment on all of Plaintiff's claims. The clerk shall enter judgment in favor of defendant and against plaintiff. Signed by Judge Frederick J Martone on 6/2/10. (LSP)
February 10, 2010 56 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER denying defendant's 48 Motion to Strike. Signed by Judge Frederick J Martone on 02/10/10.(ESL)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Scheitlin v. Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Douglas G Scheitlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?