Stokes v. Schriro et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|December 10, 2009
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 . Petitioner's amended petition for writ of habeas corpus 13 is denied. The Clerk of Court shall terminate this action. The Court has considered whether a certificate of appealability should issue under 28 U.S.C. section 2253(c) and concludes it should not. Petitioner has not "made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. section 2253(c)(2). Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 12/9/2009. (LAD)
|October 30, 2009
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 13 Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus : Recommending that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be denied and dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark E Aspey on 10/29/09. (ESL)
|March 30, 2009
ORDER re 3 Petitioner's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is granted. Charles L. Ryan, Interim Director of the ADOC, is substituted as Respondent for Dora B. Schriro pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Hencef orth, proceedings in this action must be in the name of Charles L. Ryan as Respondent. The Petition (Doc. #1) is dismissed without prejudice, with leave to amend. Petitioner has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file an amended petition in compliance with this Order. If Petitioner fails to file an amended petition within 30 days from the filing date of this Order, the Clerk of Court must enter, without further notice to Petitioner, a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejud ice. The Clerk of Court must provide Petitioner with a current, court-approved form for filing a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Special Prisoner Deadline due by 4/30/2009. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 3/27/09. (KMG, )
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?