Ecommerce Innovations L.L.C. v. Does 1-10
- Rip-off Report Lawsuit Updates: Certain Approval Programs and Ecommerce Innovations. By Professor Eric Goldman. Technology & Marketing Law Blog
Ecommerce Innovations L.L.C. |
Does 1-10 |
Xcentric Ventures, L.L.C. |
2:2008mc00093 |
September 23, 2008 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Other Statutory Actions Office |
Maricopa |
David G Campbell |
Other |
Federal Question |
Civil Miscellaneous Case |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 29 MANDATE of 9th Circuit (Certified Copy) - Pursuant to the stipulation under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b) by appellant and appellee, it is ordered that appeal No. 09-15488 be dismissed. A copy of this order shall act as and for the mandate of this court re case number 09-15488, as to 23 Notice of Appeal filed by Xcentric Ventures, LLC (Attachments: # 1 NDA)(SAT) |
Filing 28 ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE that the above-referenced matter is hereby dismissed without prejudice, each side to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees re stipulation 26 . Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 9/15/09. (TLJ) |
Filing 27 Additional Attachments to Main Document re 26 Other Notice Proposed Order of Dismissal Without Prejudice by Plaintiff Ecommerce Innovations L.L.C.. (Dybus, Donnelly) |
Filing 26 STIPULATION (Joint) for Dismissal Without Prejudice by Ecommerce Innovations L.L.C. (Dybus, Donnelly) Modified on 9/15/2009 INCORRECT EVENT SELECTED. THIS ENTRY HAS BEEN MODIFIED FROM (Notice) TO (Stipulation for Dismissal) (KMG). |
Filing 25 Ninth Circuit Case Number 09-15488 for 23 Notice of Appeal. (SAT) |
Filing 24 APPEAL PROCESSED to Ninth Circuit re: 23 Notice of Appeal filed by Xcentric Ventures, LLC. Filed dates for: Notice of Appeal *3/6/2009*, *Complaint/Motion* *9/23/2008*, Appealed Orders *2/10/09; 11/26/08*, Appealed Judgment *None; Misc. action*. Court Reporter *None* Fee Status: *Paid on 3/6/2009 in the amount of $455.00*.************. Appellant Attorney: *Maria Speth* *(Retained)* *mcs@jaburgwilk.com*. Appellee Attorney: *Donnelly A. Dybus* *(Retained)* *ddybus@buchalter.com***. Copies sent to all parties and 9th Circuit. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Record) (DMT, ) |
Filing 23 NOTICE OF APPEAL to 9th Circuit, as to 16 , 22 Order by Xcentric Ventures, LLC. Filing fee received: $ 455.00, receipt number 09700000000002632948. (Speth, Maria) Modified on 3/9/2009 TO ADD DOCUMENT LINKAGE (DMT, ) |
Filing 22 ORDER re 17 MOTION to Stay re Order Granting Motion to Compel And Motion for Reconsideration by Xcentric Ventures, LLC. (Gingras, David) filed by Xcentric Ventures, LLC. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 2/10/2009. (NVO) |
Filing 21 RESPONSE in Opposition re 17 MOTION to Stay re Order Granting Motion to Compel And Motion for Reconsideration filed by Ecommerce Innovations L.L.C.. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit Declaration of David Strager attaching Exhibits 1-4)(Dybus, Donnelly) |
Filing 20 ORDER granting 17 Motion to Stay. Ecommerce Innovations shall by 12/19/2008 file a response to Xcentric Ventures' motion for reconsideration. No reply permitted. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 12/16/2008.(NVJ) |
Filing 19 AFFIDAVIT in Support re 17 MOTION to Stay re Order Granting Motion to Compel And Motion for Reconsideration. (Gingras, David) |
Filing 18 AFFIDAVIT in Support re 17 MOTION to Stay re Order Granting Motion to Compel And Motion for Reconsideration. (Gingras, David) |
Filing 17 MOTION to Stay re Order Granting Motion to Compel And Motion for Reconsideration by Xcentric Ventures, LLC. (Gingras, David) |
Filing 16 ORDER. Plaintiff Ecommerce Innovations LLC's 1 Motion to compel compliance with subpoena is granted; Xcentric Ventures LLC shall comply with the subpoena (Dkt. #1-2 at 23-25) by 12/5/08; Xcentric Ventures LLC's 12 Motion for sanctions is denied; the Clerk is directed to terminate this action. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 11/25/08. (REW, ) |
Filing 15 Notice re Filing Signature Page by Xcentric Ventures, LLC re 11 Reply (Gingras, David) |
Filing 14 RESPONSE in Opposition re 12 MOTION for Sanctions against Mr. Strager PLAINTIFFS RESPONSE TO XCENTRIC VENTURES, LLC's 11 SUR-REPLY re 1 AND OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SANCTIONS; AND MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES filed by Ecommerce Innovations L.L.C.. (Dybus, Donnelly) Modified on 10/23/2008 (TLJ). DOCKET TEXT MODIFIED TO REFLECT DOCUMENT LINKAGE. |
Filing 13 DECLARATION of David S. Gingras in Support of 11 Sur-Reply by Objector Xcentric Ventures, LLC. to Plaintiff's 1 Motion to Compel (SAT) |
Filing 12 MOTION for Sanctions against Mr. Strager by Xcentric Ventures, LLC. (same pdf as doc #11) (SAT) |
Filing 11 Sur-Reply to Plaintiff's 1 MOTION to Compel by Objector Xcentric Ventures, LLC. (SAT) |
Filing 10 ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: Non-Party Xcentric Ventures, LLC's 7 Motion for Leave to File Sur-Reply re: Motion to Compel is granted. The Clerk of the Court is directed to file Dkt. #8. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 10/21/08.(SAT) |
Filing 9 LODGED Proposed Declaration of David S. Gingras in Support of Surreply re: Motion to Compel re: 7 MOTION for Leave to File Surreply re: Motion to Compel. Document to be filed by Clerk if Motion to Leave to File or Amend is granted. Filed by Xcentric Ventures, LLC. (Gingras, David) |
Filing 8 LODGED Proposed Proposed Surreply re: Motion to Compel re: 7 MOTION for Leave to File Surreply re: Motion to Compel. Document to be filed by Clerk if Motion to Leave to File or Amend is granted. Filed by Xcentric Ventures, LLC. (Gingras, David) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to File Surreply re: Motion to Compel by Xcentric Ventures, LLC. (Gingras, David) |
Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Ecommerce Innovations L.L.C.. (Dybus, Donnelly) |
Filing 5 DECLARATION in Support re 1 MOTION to Compel Compliance with Subpoena Issued to Xcentric Ventures, LLC filed by Ecommerce Innovations L.L.C.. (Dybus, Donnelly) Modified on 10/14/2008 (LAD). INCORRECT EVENT SELECTED. THIS ENTRY HAS BEEN MODIFIED FROM AFFIDAVIT TO DECLARATION. |
Filing 4 REPLY in Support re 1 MOTION to Compel Compliance with Subpoena Issued to Xcentric Ventures filed by Ecommerce Innovations L.L.C.. (Dybus, Donnelly) |
Filing 3 RESPONSE in Opposition re 1 MOTION to Compel filed by Xcentric Ventures, L.L.C.. (Speth, Maria) |
Filing 2 NOTICE TO PARTY OF DEFICIENCY RE CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT: Pursuant to FRCiv 7.1 and LRCiv 7.1.1 the attached Corporate Disclosure Statement form must be filed by all nongovernmental corporate parties with their first appearance. A supplemental statement must be filed upon any change in the information. In addition, if not already filed, the Corporate Disclosure Statement should be filed within 15 days. Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set for 10/8/2008 as to Ecommerce Innovations L.L.C. (REK) |
Minute Order: Motion to Compel Compliance with Subpoena to Xcentric Ventures, LLC, DBA Ripoffreport.com is pending before Judge David G. Campbell. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (REK) |
Filing 1 Miscellaneous Case Opening Regarding: Motions to Compel Compliance with Subpoena Duces Tecum - FRCVP 37(a) and 45(c)(2)(B). Case Opening Fee Received: $ 39.00 receipt number 09700000000002244614, filed by Xcentric Ventures, L.L.C., ECOMMERCE INNOVATIONS L.L.C.,a Nevada limited liability company. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit A and Exhibits 1-6, # 2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Dybus, Donnelly) Modified on 9/24/2008 (REK). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.