Pickette v. Mow et al
| Clifford Pickette |
| Richard Mow, Janet K. McNaughton and Jennifer Roach |
| 2:2009cv00020 |
| January 15, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Maricopa |
| Michelle H Burns (PS) |
| David G Campbell |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
5
ORDER (Service Packet). Plaintiff's 4 Motion for Proceed In forma pauperis is granted; Counts II and III and Defendants McNaughton and Roach are dismissed without prejudice; Defendant Mow must answer Count I; the Clerk must send Plaintiff a se rvice packet including the Complaint 1 , this Order, and both summons and request for waiver forms for Defendant Mow; this matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Michelle H Burns for all pretrial proceedings as authorized under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Service Packet due by 4/13/2009. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 3/24/09. (REW, )
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER ; within 30 days, Plaintiff must either pay the $350.00 filing fee or file a completed Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and a certified six-month trust account statement; if plaintiff fails to comply with this order, the Clerk must enter a judgment of dismissal of this aciton without prejudice and without further notice to plaintiff. Special Prisoner Deadline due by 3/6/2009. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 2/4/09. (REW, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
