Hillis, et al v. Heineman, et al
Steve Hillis |
Barbara L Heineman and Ronald E Heineman |
2:2009cv00073 |
January 12, 2009 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Racketeer/Corrupt Organization Office |
Maricopa |
David G Campbell |
None |
Diversity |
28:1332 Diversity-Conversion |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 92 ORDER denying 87 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 8/31/2009.(NVO) |
Filing 91 ORDER denying 88 Motion for New Trial; denying 89 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendants shall not file a response to the motion for reconsideration. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 8/18/2009.(NVO) |
Filing 85 ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendants' 65 Motion to Dismiss Case; the complaint 1 , counterclaims 20 , 52 , and third-party complaint 29 are dismissed without prejudice; denying Defendants' 74 Motion for Sanctions; the Clerk is directed to terminate this action. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 7/23/09.(REW, ) |
Filing 70 ORDER denying 49 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 5/14/2009.(NVO) |
Filing 48 ORDER denying 31 Motion to Dismiss Case for Lack of Jurisdiction. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 4/1/2009.(NVO) |
Filing 45 ORDER denying 37 Motion to Stay discovery; granting 42 Motion to Expedite ruling; denying without prejudice 15 Motion to disqualify counsel. Case Management Conference remains set for 3/27/2009 at 4:30 pm. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 3/25/2009.(NVO) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.