GE Capital Franchise Finance Corporation v. Cow Tippers Aramingo et al
GE Capital Franchise Finance Corporation |
Cow Tippers Aramingo, Horn Restaurants, Sensational Sandwich Company Aramingo, Charles E Fletcher, Jeff Horn and James Sweet |
2:2009cv00082 |
January 13, 2009 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Contract: Other Office |
Maricopa |
David G Campbell |
None |
Diversity |
28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 ORDER AND DEFAULT JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED: Pla's request for an award of pre- jgm taxable costs is denied without prejudice. Pla's 20 Amended Motion for default jgm is granted. Default Jgm is entered in favor of Pla and against Dft Cow T ippers Aramingo, LLC on count one of the complaint and against DftsCharles Fletcher, Horn Restaurants, LLC, and Sensational Sandwich Company Aramingo, LLC on count two, jointly and severally, in the total sum of $1,281,826.27, plus pre-jgm and p ost-jgm interest at the rate of 14% per annum. Pla is awarded reasonable atty fees in the amount of $10,662.80.Pla shall file a report regarding the status of the claims against Dfts James Sweet and Jeff Horn by 9/18/09. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 9/1/09. (SAT) |
Filing 15 ORDER denying 14 Motion for Default Judgment. Plaintiffs shall have until 6/5/2009 to file a new motion for default judgment consistent with this order. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 5/22/2009.(NVO) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.