Vijan v. Schriro et al
| Masum Vijan |
| Dora B Schriro and Arizona Attorney General, State of |
| 2:2009cv00121 |
| January 20, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Habeas Corpus (General) Office |
| Maricopa |
| David G Campbell |
| Jay R Irwin (PS) |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
38
ORDER denying 35 Petitioner's Motion to Vacate and the Clerk is directed to terminate this action. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 7/23/12.(LSP)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER that Magistrate Judge Jay R. Irwin's 28 Report and Recommendation is accepted. Petitioner Masum James Vijans amended petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 13) is dismissed. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly. The Cour t has considered whether a certificate of appealability should issue under 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c), and concludes that it should not. Petitioner has not shown that "jurists of reason" would find it debatable whether the Court is correct in its procedural ruling. See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 12/14/10. (ESL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
