Torrez v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
| David Torrez |
| Corrections Corporation of America, C. De Rosa, Burnett, Meier, Johnson and Unknown Officers |
| 2:2009cv00957 |
| May 4, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Pinal |
| Michelle H Burns (PS) |
| Mary H Murguia |
| Plaintiff |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
ORDER The 11 Second Amended Complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim. The Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with prejudice that states that the dismissal counts as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Signed by Judge Mary H Murguia on 12/16/09. (ESL, )
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER 6 Pla's motion for an extension of time until August 9, 2009 in which to file a First Amended Complaint is granted. Pla has until August 9, 2009 to file a first amended complaint in compliance with the Order filed on June 11, 2009, doc.# 4. If Pla fails to file an amended complaint no later than August 9, 2009, the Clerk of Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with prejudice that states that the dismissal counts as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Special Prisoner Deadline due by 8/9/2009. Signed by Judge Mary H Murguia on 7/10/09.(KMG, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
