Johnson v. Ryan et al
George Johnson |
Charles Ryan and Arizona Attorney General, State of |
2:2009cv00959 |
May 4, 2009 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Phoenix Division Office |
Pima |
David K Duncan (PS) |
G Murray Snow |
None |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Judge Duncan's 15 Report and Recommendation is accepted as set forth in this Order; the 7 Second Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and request for an evidentiary hearing are denied without prejudice; the Clerk is directed to terminate this action; a certificate of appealability is denied with respect to each of the claims asserted in Mr. Johnson's Petition. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 5/5/10. (REW) |
Filing 8 ORDER The Clerk of Court must serve a copy of the 7 Second Amended Petition and this Order on the Respondent and the Attorney General of the State of Arizona by certified mail. Respondents must answer the Second Amended Petition within 40 days of t he date of service. Petitioner may file a reply within 30 days from the date of service of the answer. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge David K. Duncan for further proceedings and a report and recommendation. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 11/19/09. (ESL) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.