Jimenez v. Newell, et al
| Marco Antonio Jimenez |
| Julie P Newell, Christopher T Whitten, Andrew Thomas, Joesph M Arpaio and Arizona, State of |
| 2:2009cv00998 |
| May 11, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| David G Campbell |
| Plaintiff |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
ORDER denying 32 Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 4/8/11.(LSP)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER granting 18 State Defendants' Motion to Dismiss with prejudice; party State of Arizona, Julie P Newell and Christopher T Whitten terminated; County Defendants' motion is denied as moot; denying Plaintiff's 22 Motion to Appoin t Counsel; denying 22 Plaintiff's Motion for Civil Remedy; denying 23 Plaintiff's Motion for investigation; and denying 24 Plaintiff's Motion to include all Parties incolved in case No. CV 09-998 PHX-DGC and for Injunctive Relief. The action is dismissed with prejudice and the Clerk shall terminate this action. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 12/2/09.(LSP)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: Dft Thomas and Arpaio's 16 Motion for More Definite Statement is denied as moot. Pla shall, by 9/25/09, file a response to the 16 Motion to Quash Service and a response to the 18 Motion to Dismiss the amended complaint. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 9/4/09. (SAT)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER Plaintiff's Complaint, 1 is dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff has until 9/4/09 to file and amended complaint. Clerk must terminate this action if Plaintiff fails to comply. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying as moot 4 Motion to Bring Forward the Verdict in this Case and 13 Motion for More Definite Statement. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 8/3/09.(LSP)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
