Trammell v. United States of America
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|January 28, 2010
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 8 . ORDER that Respondent's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence is denied 1 and 3 . ORDER denying without prejudice Movant's Motion to Terminate Supervised Release 53 . The Cour mak es no ruling on the merits of said Motion. ORDER denying without prejudice Movant's Request for Post Conviction Court Appointed Attorney 55 . The Court makes no ruling on the merits of said Motion. ORDER denying Movant's Certificae of Appealability and Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, as Movant has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Signed by Judge Mary H Murguia on 1/26/10. (TLJ)
|June 18, 2009
ORDER re 3 Movant's May 21, 2009 Motion (Doc. #3 in 09-CV-1085-PHX-MHM (MEA)) is construed as an Amended § 2255 Motion attacking the revocation of his supervised release and his term of confinement in 04-CR-50178-PHX-MHM. The Clerk of Cou rt must serve a copy of the Amended § 2255 Motion (Doc. #3) and this Order on the United States Attorney for the District of Arizona. The United States Attorney for the District of Arizona has 60 days from the date of service within which to ans wer the Amended § 2255 Motion. Movant may file a reply within 30 days from the date of service of the answer to the Amended § 2255 Motion. The matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Mark E. Aspey pursuant to Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for further proceedings and a report and recommendation. Signed by Judge Mary H Murguia on 6/18/09. (KMG, )
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?